Overclocking Results

As expected the Threadripper CPUs were able to score 4 GHz but unfortunately same Ryzen 7 weren't able to break on the far side that point. Extreme voltages might see you hit 4.1 - 4.2 GHz care what we've seen with about Ryzen CPUs but for 24/7 usage 4 GHz looks to be the limit.

Anyway at 4 GHz the 1950X spat knocked out an incredible score of 3408 pts in Cinebench though due to the way XFR works this overclock actually slightly reduced the single thread performance. You could probably fine tune the overclock to avoid this but with time against us we didn't smatter with the overclocking too much.

Overclocked the Blender supply time for the 1950X was cut downfield by an impressive 11% piece the 1920X time was decreased away 6%. This way even overclocked the Pith i9-7900X wasn't much faster than the 1920X and wasn't fit to match the stock 1950X in this application.

Interestingly this time when examination with Corona the 1920X adage a massive 17% public presentation betterment when overclocked patc the 1950X was sporty 7% faster. This meant both overclocked Threadripper parts were much quicker than the overclocked 7900X.

Back to the kinda margins seen in Blender we find that piece the 1950X was 9% quicker overclocked the 1920X was barely 5% quicker. This meant when testing with Premiere Pro CC the 1920X did trail the Core i9-7900X while the 1950X was quite lot faster.

Overclocking performance in Warhammer was tested exploitation Uniform Access and here the overclocks did little to boost functioning.

Finally we have the overclocking ability consumption figures and hither Threadripper looks quite moral, especially in telling to the Core i7-7900X. Whereas the Intel Central processor pushed total system consumption to 388 watts, the 1950X hit 358 watts, an 8% reduction for what was often between 20 - 30% more carrying into action.